Pinned toot

I wish he'd omitted the silly paeans to Johnson and Brexit, and the stupid swipe at pastiche “identity politics”. But much otherwise of interest in this @michaelgove@twitter.com speech. If only more public policy debate could be had at this level. More thoughts later assets.publishing.service.gov.

Hi fellow tooters! Any recommendations for tools to auto-delete my toots after 7 days, as I do with TweetDelete on Tw*tter? I’ve also stopped mirroring my tweets and RTs to this account — is that what people here generally prefer? (I’m still sending toots to Tw*tter for now :)

…even though diversity in lived experience and background of civil servants and politicians is critical. (I am also well aware that there are many non-simplistic “truths” :) /ENDS

Show thread

…led politicians (and voters) unhappy with the political direction evidence suggests simply refocusing on alternative “truths” instead. I am also very pro government being distributed around the UK, but there is no “metropolitan” or “elite” truth 🤷🏻‍♂️

Show thread

All this said: you cannot in any seriousness make arguments about better use of while promoting . The post-truth nature of so much of Gove, Johnson and allies’ political activities shows that a greater focus on use of evidence in public policy (👍🏻) has sadly…

Show thread

I applaud Gove for making this detailed case for reform at the Ditchley Foundation yesterday [gov.uk/government/publications], much of which I agree with, and look forward to seeing other people’s comments. I must also resurrect my blog and publish this, before it’s auto-deleted :)

Show thread

He REALLY needs to read @ArielEzrachi@twitter.com and @MauriceStucke@twitter.com’s new book, especially the section on toxic competition: harpercollins.com/978006289283

Show thread

Great that Gove is so pro-experimentation. That fundamentally requires devolution, and push-back against the notion of the “postcode lottery”. However: "We should also be fearless to compare individual courts, judges and CPS managers on their efficacy on processing cases” (§120).

Show thread

I was *astonished* when I became mid-career civil servant to receive a hour’s training on my my laptop and DCMS Google Docs installation worked, and nothing else! (I later took peer-led “lunch and learn” sessions on writing a submission, project management, etc.)

Show thread

Gove rightly notes the damage done by "the whirligig of Civil Service transfers and promotions” (§101), and the great “What Works” centres (§99). And that "we need to ensure that basic writing, meeting chairing and time management skills are de rigueur for all policy” officials

Show thread

Gove lists a number of examples (§97) of specific expertise he thinks officials should have. I actually think they should be trained instead to make better use of external expertise, b/c they will *never* have the time to specialise to the extent academics and practitioners do

Show thread

…leads sometimes to (in my experience) slapdash, barely considered, politicised embarrassments. Why not make these automatically available to select committees, or even (gasp) the public, so external experts can critique and feed in more diverse knowledge and experience?

Show thread

Gove wants "tight, evidence-rich, fact-based” submissions (the formal documents civil servants use to ask for a decision from a minister, maintaining an evidence trail.) Ministers could demand those today. The fact they seem to prefer faster (“agile”), higher volumes of these...

Show thread

Gove wants civil servants to have "deep, domain-specific, knowledge.” (§94) Does he realise that goes against the entire philosophy, HR policies, and typical career route of the recent civil service, and what a profound change this would be?

Show thread

Ditto for para 88 ("Suitably anonymised as I say the deep and broad pool of health data we have can improve diagnostics and treatment, it can support life science innovation and it can close the health inequality gap.”) /cc @medconfidential@twitter.com

Show thread

A welcome focus on data and evaluation (social as well as economic impact) of policies. But (para.87) you *cannot* publish anonymised high-dimensional data while protecting privacy. You need to give protected access to researchers, as we wrote in 2013: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

Show thread

Some specific responses to Gove speech where I have particular expertise to comment. I will leave the wider critique of his political philosophy, and Rooseveltian history, to others… (Including @cybermatron@twitter.com, who has written my favourite thread on “identity politics”)...

Show thread

PS I had the most wonderful holiday in Malawi last September. I hope lots more people will visit post-Covid 🌍

Show thread

4) UK election law and @ElectoralCommUK@twitter.com need a serious overhaul and more ambitious leadership and powers if we are to have broad confidence in future election results

Show thread

2) @UKLabour@twitter.com has no choice (for the future of the UK) but to work with @LibDems@twitter.com, @TheGreenParty@twitter.com, @theSNP@twitter.com and @Plaid_Cymru@twitter.com towards a united front at the next election; 3) Opposition must preserve the ability of the @UKSupremeCourt@twitter.com to void any more blatant illegality by the govt...

Show thread
Show more
Mastodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!